Kensington Memorial Park - Draft Masterplan

Closed 12 Sep 2021

Opened 19 Jul 2021

Feedback updated 21 Oct 2021

We asked

We asked for your views on the existing features in Kensington Memorial Park with the aim of making improvements throughout the park using the feedback and ideas from the local community. The consultation was split into three phases; Initial Ideas and Feedback, Focus Group Sessions and a formal survey. Idea and comments have been split into categories according to the type of activity they represent – future of park buildings, sport and fitness facilities, other proposals and playground improvements.

You said

Future of park buildings:

  • Support for housing the café/kiosk in a new building near its existing location. The new building is also intended to house the sports changing rooms, public toilets, Changing Places toilet and grounds maintenance office. 50 per cent of respondents supported this proposal versus 36 per cent who supported housing the café/kiosk in the refurbished toilet block. 13 per cent of respondents did not support either of these options. 
  • No clear support for a preferred use for the refurbished toilet block. 40 per cent of respondents outlined that they did have a preferred use versus 60 per cent who said that they did not have a preferred use. Respondents who did not support either option were asked to provide alternative ideas and out of those 11 supported having the changing rooms next to the football pitch.
  • Out of the respondents who had another preferred use for the refurbished toilet block the top three responses were to refurbish into a well maintained toilet block (13 responses), transform into a café (10 responses) and extend the building to house changing rooms (9 responses).

Sport and fitness facilities:

  • Support for installing an outdoor gym with a mix of calisthenics and machine equipment near St Mark’s Road. 64 per cent of respondents supported this proposal versus 20 per cent against and 16 per cent who were neutral.
  • Support for modifying one of the tennis courts to include basketball nets and line markings. 57 per cent of respondents supported this proposal versus 24 per cent against and 19 per cent who were neutral.
  • Support for installing anti-glare spill floodlights around the tennis courts. 52 per cent of respondents supported this proposal versus 19 per cent against and 29 per cent who were neutral.
  • Support for installing a junior fitness circuit to replace teenager play items near St Mark’s Road. 50 per cent of respondents supported this proposal versus 22 per cent against and 29 per cent who were neutral.

Other proposals:

  • Support for installing a dog agility area in the picnic table area to the south of the tennis courts. 50 per cent of respondents supported this proposal versus 28 per cent against and 21 per cent who were neutral. 14 people also commented that dogs need to be able to use all space in the park.
  • There was no clear support for installing a new hard footpath around one of the grass areas. 47 per cent of respondents supported this proposal versus 32 per cent against and 21 per cent who were neutral.

Children’s playground improvements

Toddler Playground:

  • Satisfaction with current toddler playground: A net total of 45 per cent (6 per cent very satisfied, 39 per cent satisfied) of respondents were satisfied with the current junior playground. A net total of 22 per cent (19 per cent dissatisfied, 3 per cent very dissatisfied) of respondents were dissatisfied with the current toddler playground.
  • Types of equipment to include in toddler playground proposals: The most popular play options were swings, a slide and climbing. The least popular options were hanging, spinning and balancing.

Junior Playground:

  • Satisfaction with current junior playground: A net total of 44 per cent (9 per cent very satisfied, 35 per cent satisfied) of respondents were satisfied with the current junior playground. A net total of 22 per cent (19 per cent dissatisfied, 3 per cent very dissatisfied) of respondents were dissatisfied with the current junior playground.
  • Types of equipment to include in junior playground proposals: The most popular play options were a zip wire, climbing and swings. The least popular options were spinning, balancing and bouncing.

Shade and shelter from the elements in the children’s playground:

  • Support for providing shade and shelter. 82 per cent of respondents said they would like more areas that provide shade and shelter versus 13 per cent against.

We did

The results will be used to help with the scope and priority of the works and Council will be working to establish a Kensington Memorial Park Steering Group and other sub groups to prioritise and implement supported works where possible.

Results updated 18 Oct 2021

Files:

Overview

The Council are seeking your views on improvements to Kensington Memorial Park (St Mark’s Park).  

This consultation follows a number of discussions we have had with people over the past few years. In 2019 we asked people for their views on the future of park buildings and in 2020 we asked people about the water play area and proposals to install an outdoor gym.

More recently in spring 2021 we held a series of discussion groups, where members of the Parks Team met with local community groups to discuss issues and proposals for the park. The key findings were: -

  • Most people were in favour of a combination of refurbishment and replacement of existing park buildings.
  • Most people were in favour of the public toilet block being refurbished into either a new café/kiosk or sports changing rooms, with all other facilities housed in a new building.
    • Parks Team feedback - Toilet block would need extension to meet size recommendations for sports changing rooms.
  • Groups that represent people with physical and mental disabilities supported accessibility improvements for their users.
  • Most people supported measures to keep dogs away from the sports pitch (when in use).
  • Most people supported proposals to provide places to shelter from the elements
  • There was some support for installing floodlights to the tennis courts, but this wasn’t seen as a priority for investment.
    • Parks Team feedback - Investment for floodlights will come out of a dedicated funding pot and will not be at the expense of other park improvements.  
  • Some people proposed installing a perimeter footpath around the edge of the park.
    • Parks Team feedback – there isn’t enough space to safely install a footpath around the back of the sports pitch. However, a new footpath around the amenity grass area, to the east of the pitch, is an option.
  • Most people did not support the installation of a community garden although some people did support wildflower planting.
    • Parks Team feedback – wildflower planting will take place as part of Bee Superhighway project.
  • Most people did not support having a periodic farmers market in the park.

A full summary of discussion group proposals and responses to can be found at Kensington Memorial Park | Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (rbkc.gov.uk).

Building on the results of these exercises, we now want to ask how proposals could fit together.

This survey will run for a period of six weeks, and will close on 12 September 2021. Information about how your data will be processed can be found at the end of the survey.

If you have any queries, require a paper copy of the consultation, or require assistance in other languages, please contact the Parks Projects Team using the contact details in the 'Contact' section of this page.

Areas

  • Dalgarno
  • St. Helen's

Interests

  • Parks
  • Consultations